Layout design: how sequential and simultaneous information displays affect decision-making processes in digital environments
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A substantial amount of literature describes how psychology has studied the irrationally of the human mind and its processes, but few authors have written about how layout design influences its decision-making processes. This article proposes an experiment to analyze how users choose a specific product based on its position and the way that options are displayed to them (sequentially or simultaneously).
Article Details
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación y pueda editarlo, reproducirlo, distribuirlo, exhibirlo y comunicarlo en el país y en el extranjero mediante medios impresos y electrónicos. Asimismo, asumen el compromiso sobre cualquier litigio o reclamación relacionada con derechos de propiedad intelectual, exonerando de responsabilidad a la Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica. Además, se establece que los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
References
[2] M. C. Munger. Persuasion, psychology and public choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80, 2011, p. 290–300.
[3] R. Mora. Acerca de la racionalidad y la irracionalidad de nuestras decisiones. Fractal: Revista de Psicología, 23(2), 2011, pp. 425–428.
[4] D. Ariely. Predictably Irrational. New York, United States: Harper Collins, 2008.
[5] Daae, J., Boks, C. (). A classification of user research methods for design for sustainable behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, pp. 680–689.
[6] D. Y. Sleeth-Keppler and S. C. Wheeler. A multidimensional association approach to sequential consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 2015, pp. 14–23.
[7] A. FishBach, R. K. Ratner, Y. Zhang. Inherently loyal or easily bored?: Nonconscious activation of consistency versus variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 2011, pp. 38–48.
[8] C. Messner and M. Wänke. Unconscious information processing reduces information overload and increases product satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 2011, pp. 9–13.
[9] R. M. Rohrer and E. Swing. Web-based information visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Information Visualization, 1997, pp. 52–59.
[10] J. L. Gabbard, D. Hix, and J.E. Swan II. User-centered design and evaluation of virtual environments. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Virtual Reality, 1999, pp. 51–59.
[11] W. H. Rynson, F. Li, L. Li, T. L. Kunii, B. Guo, B. Zhang and M. Gutierrez. Emerging web graphics standards and technologies. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Web Graphics Tutorial, 2003, pp. 66–75.
[12] L. Zhu, and B. L. Grabowski. Web-Based Animation or Static Graphics: Is the Extra Cost of Animation Worth It? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(3), 2006, pp. 329–347.
[13] U. Bhandari, T. Neben, K. Chang, and W. Y. Chua. Effects of interface design factors on affective responses and quality evaluations in mobile applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 2017, pp. 525–534.
[14] F. Hernández-Castro and J. Monge-Fallas. IUI – Interfaces Intangibles: el contexto. Memoria del Sétimo Congreso Internacional sobre Enseñanza de la Matemática Asistida por Computadora. 2011. Cartago, Costa Rica.
[15] A. Marcus. Metaphor design for user interfaces. CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1998, pp. 129–130.
[16] D. A. Norman. The design of everyday things. New York, United States: Basic Books.1988.
[17] E. G. Nilsson. Design patterns for user interface for mobile applications. Advances in Engineering Software, 40, 2009, pp. 1318–1328.
[18] B. A. Myers and W. Buxton. Creating Highly-Interactive and Graphical User Interfaces by Demonstration. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 20(4), 1986, pp.249–258.
[19] J. Nielsen. Usability inspection methods. CHI ‘94 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 1994, pp. 413–414.
[20] N. Perovic. Psychological pricing in modern retailing: the case of wine sector in hard-discounter chains of Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior, 4, 2014, pp. 83–95.
[21] J. Kolko. Thoughts on Interaction Design. Massachusetts, United States: Elsevier. 2007.
[22] N. Kolenda. Psychology of Choice, 2016, https://www.nickkolenda.com/pdf/psychology-of-choice.pdf?x78043
[23] N. Kolenda. Psychology of Pricing. 2016. https://www.nickkolenda.com/psychological-pricing-strategies/
[24] R. Haque. Investigations on User Interface for Online Shopping: Towards a Real Thing Based Design Approach. Other thesis, Concordia University. 2000.