Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence use among chemistry students at Universidad Estatal a Distancia: a diagnostic study

Main Article Content

Ana L. Rodríguez-Zúñiga
Daniel Diaz-Rodríguez
Daniela Ramírez-Viales
Paulo Boj-Coti
Rodolfo Antonio Hernández-Chaverri

Abstract

This diagnostic study aimed to identify and interpret how chemistry students at the Chair of Chemical Sciences for Engineering of the State Distance University (UNED) are using generative AI in their academic activities, and whether their perceptions changed after receiving guidance on its ethical and academic use. A mixed-methods approach was employed, incorporating data collection through an opinion survey of 82 students before and after training focused on the ethical use of tools such as Semantic Scholar, ChatGPT, Copilot, and DeepSeek. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Student’s t-test, considering differences between both time points. The results showed that, although attitudes toward AI remained positive, no statistically significant changes were observed after receiving the training. The study concludes that ethical literacy in AI should be incorporated across higher education, accompanied by teacher guidance and sustained practice.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rodríguez-Zúñiga, A. L., Diaz-Rodríguez, D., Ramírez-Viales, D., Boj-Coti, P., & Hernández-Chaverri, R. A. (2026). Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence use among chemistry students at Universidad Estatal a Distancia: a diagnostic study. Tecnología En Marcha Journal, 39(5), Pág. 170–189. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v39i5.8520
Section
Inteligencia Artificial en educación superior

References

[1] S. A. D. Popenici and S. Kerr, “Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education,” Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 22, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8.

[2] V. K. Quy, B. T. Thanh, A. Chehri, D. M. Linh, and D. A. Tuan, “AI and Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Vision and Approach of a Specific University in Vietnam,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 14, p. 11093, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151411093.

[3] E. Ötleş, C. A. James, K. D. Lomis, and J. O. Woolliscroft, “Teaching artificial intelligence as a fundamental toolset of medicine,” Cell Rep. Med., vol. 3, no. 12, p. 100824, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100824.

[4] Isak. Karabegović, Artificial intelligence in industry 4.0 : the future that comes true. Akademija nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, 2024.

[5] M. SOORI, R. DASTRES, B. AREZOO, and F. Karimi Ghaleh JOUGH, “Intelligent robotic systems in Industry 4.0: A review,” Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 2024007–2024007, 2024, doi: 10.51393/j.jamst.2024007.

[6] J. Su and W. Yang, “Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT: A Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education,” ECNU Review of Education, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 355–366, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1177/20965311231168423.

[7] Y. Jin, L. Yan, V. Echeverria, D. Gašević, and R. Martinez-Maldonado, “Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 8, p. 100348, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348.

[8] S. Plata, M. A. De Guzman, and A. Quesada, “Emerging Research and Policy Themes on Academic Integrity in the Age of Chat GPT and Generative AI,” Asian Journal of University Education, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 743–758, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.24191/ajue.v19i4.24697.

[9] D. Wood and S. H. Moss, “Evaluating the impact of students’ generative AI use in educational contexts,” Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 152–167, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1108/JRIT-06-2024-0151.

[10] M. Giannakos et al., “The promise and challenges of generative AI in education,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2518–2544, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2394886.

[11] F. Marrero Soto, “UNED aprueba política para uso responsable de la Inteligencia Artificial.,” Acontecer UNED CR. Accessed: Oct. 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://acontecer.uned.ac.cr/uned-aprueba-politica-para-uso-responsable-de-la-inteligencia-artificial/

[12] M. Chaves, “Regulación de IA en la UCR no será punitiva: ‘Buscamos una adecuada implementación’, asegura asesor académico de la Vicerrectoría de Docencia. ,” Semanario Universidad. . Accessed: Oct. 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://semanariouniversidad.com/universitarias/regulacion-de-ia-en-la-ucr-no-sera-punitiva-buscamos-una-adecuada-implementacion-asegura-asesor-academico-de-la-vicerrectoria-de-docencia/

[13] Consejo Universitario Universidad Estatal a Distancia, “Política Institucional de Inteligencia Artificial en la UNED. Área de Información y Documentación Institucional ,” CIDREB.

[14] Roberto. Hernández Sampieri and C. Paulina. Mendoza Torres, Metodología de la investigación : las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill Education, 2018.

[15] M. Urban et al., “ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study,” Comput. Educ., vol. 215, p. 105031, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105031.

[16] P. G. Amén Mora, R. A. Rincón Zambrano, L. M. Santos Mera, and X. L. Anzules Avila, “Evaluación formativa con inteligencia artificial en contextos educativos,” Revista Científica de Innovación Educativa y Sociedad Actual “ALCON,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 313–236, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.62305/alcon.v5i2.509.

[17] W. Villalobos-González, J. Herrera-Núñez, and A. Delgado-Montoya, “Integridad académica a nivel universitario: estrategias de evaluación y prevención en un curso teórico-virtual de Química,” Educación Química, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 155–170, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.22201/fq.18708404e.2025.1.87935.

[18] E. Ötleş, C. A. James, K. D. Lomis, and J. O. Woolliscroft, “Teaching artificial intelligence as a fundamental toolset of medicine,” Cell Rep. Med., vol. 3, no. 12, p. 100824, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100824.

[19] la C. y la C. UNESCO - Organización de las Naciones Unidades para la Educación, “Recomendación sobre la Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial. Paris: Impresión UNESCO,” https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137_spa.

[20] C. Stöhr, A. W. Ou, and H. Malmström, “Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, p. 100259, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259.

[21] D. A. Schmidt, B. Alboloushi, A. Thomas, and R. Magalhaes, “Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education: perceptions, challenges, and strategies for academic innovation,” Computers and Education Open, vol. 9, p. 100274, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100274.

[22] Onyebuchi Nneamaka Chisom, Chika Chioma Unachukwu, and Blessing Osawaru, “REVIEW OF AI IN EDUCATION: TRANSFORMING LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS IN AFRICA,” International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 637–654, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.51594/ijarss.v5i10.725.

[23] A. ARBITRADO Cómo citar et al., “Academic Implications of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Case Universidad de Costa Rica, Guanacaste Campus,” Revista InterSedes, vol. 26, p. enero-junio, 2025, doi: 10.15517/isucr.v26i53.56102.

[24] F. M. Solis Peralta, G. A. Huerta Patraca, and C. E. Hernández Martínez, “Inteligencia Artificial en Educación: La opinión de estudiantes universitarios sobre el uso del ChatGPT,” REVISTA PARAGUAYA DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA (REPED), vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 55–71, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.56152/reped2024-dossierIA2-art6.

[25] A. Strzelecki and S. ElArabawy, “Investigation of the moderation effect of gender and study level on the acceptance and use of generative AI by higher education students: Comparative evidence from Poland and Egypt,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1209–1230, May 2024, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13425.

[26] M. F. Abdullah and Y. A. Elewah, “AI in Education: Examining ChatGPT Awareness and Usage among University of Science & Technology Students, Aden,” International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology, vol. 08, no. 08, pp. 08–08, 2024, doi: 10.47001/IRJIET/2024.808004.

[27] L. Brenes Bonilla, T. Rivera Rivera, and D. Jiménez Obando, “Micro Estudio sobre las Aplicaciones Universitarias de IA en la UNED Costa Rica,” San José, Oct. 2025.

[28] G. Brandhofer and K. Tengler, “Acceptance of artificial intelligence in education: opportunities, concerns and need for action,” Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1105–1113, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.25082/AMLER.2024.02.005.

[29] I. Youssef Alyoussef, A. Mohammed Drwish, F. Adel Albakheet, R. Hassan Alhajhoj, and A. Ahmed Al-Mousa, “AI Adoption for Collaboration: Factors Influencing Inclusive Learning Adoption in Higher Education,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 81690–81713, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3567656.

[30] A. Bewersdorff, M. Hornberger, C. Nerdel, and D. Schiff, “AI Advocates and Cautious Critics: How AI Attitudes, AI Interest, Use of AI, and AI Literacy Build University Students’ AI Self-Efficacy,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 8, 2025, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31045.87521.

[31] I. A. Elshaer, A. M. Hasanein, and A. E. E. Sobaih, “The Moderating Effects of Gender and Study Discipline in the Relationship between University Students’ Acceptance and Use of ChatGPT,” Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1981–1995, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14070132.

[32] B. Ward, D. Bhati, F. Neha, and A. Guercio, “Analyzing the Impact of AI Tools on Student Study Habits and Academic Performance,” Dec. 2024, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02166