Artificial Intelligence, its regulation in scientific research, the case of Mexico

Main Article Content

Cinthia Yareli Velazquez-Ramos
Isaac Josmar de la O-Camacho
Alejandro D. Camacho
Luis Roberto Domínguez-Aguirre
Mariana Marcelino-Aranda

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has increasingly been integrated into various stages of the scientific research process, sparking debate within the academic community regarding its advantages, risks, and potential impact on human capabilities. While countries such as the United States, China, and Turkey have institutional positions on the subject, in Mexico, discussion and regulation are still in early stages. The objective of this paper is to analyze the public policies and editorial guidelines on the use of IAGen in scientific journals published by leading Mexican institutions, with the aim of identifying how the scientific community participates, from the publisher’s perspective, in the regulation of this technology in the preparation and publication of research. The exploratory study was carried out through a documentary analysis of official government portals and a review of the editorial criteria for the use of GenAI in the journals of the educational institutions ranked among the top in the World University Rankings 2026. The results show that, under Mexican law, there are still no regulatory frameworks that regulate the use and application of GenAI. In the editorial field, 47% of journals have no specific guidelines, 9% prohibit their use, and 44% allow them under certain restrictions. Its potential as a support tool is recognized, though the author’s responsibility and the need to make its use transparent are emphasized. We agree that GenAI is a tool for researchers, not a substitute for their intellectual work.

Article Details

How to Cite
Velazquez-Ramos, C. Y., de la O-Camacho, I. J., D. Camacho, A., Domínguez-Aguirre, L. R., & Marcelino-Aranda, M. (2026). Artificial Intelligence, its regulation in scientific research, the case of Mexico. Tecnología En Marcha Journal, 39(5), Pág. 41–50. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v39i5.8512
Section
Ética, gobernanza y regulación de la IA

References

[1] F. Morandín-Ahuerma., “What is Artificial Intelligence?”, Int. J. Res. Publ. Rev., 3, 12, 2022, doi: 10.55248/gengpi.2022.31261

[2] UNESCO. (2024). Guía para el uso de IA generativa en educación e investigación. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389227.

[3] M. Salah, F. Abdelfattah, H. A. Halbus, and M. Mohammed. “Beyond the ‘Death of Research’: Reimagining the Human–AI Collaboration in Scientific Research”, Changing Societies & Personalities, vol. 7, nº 4, pp. 31-46, 2023. doi: 10.15826/csp.2023.7.4.250

[4] I. Levin, N. Bukshtaber and K. Minyar-Beloruchev “Generative AI in the Information Society: Implications for Higher Education and Research”, BRAIN (Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience), vol. 16, nº 1, pp. 10-21, 2025. doi: 10.70594/brain/16.1/1

[5] H.S. Saetra, “The rise of the research automaton: science as process or product in the era of generative AI?” AI & Soc, 7 de ago. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s00146-025-02557-7

[6] P. E. Ekmekci, B. Buruk, B. Akar, y N. Y. Ardıçoğlu Akışın, “A Study of Academics’ Perceptions of Ethical Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Scientific Research and Publishing,” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, vol. 20, nº 4, pp. 190–199, 2025. doi: 10.1177/15562646251370869.

[7] A. da Veiga, “Ethical guidelines for the use of generative artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence-assisted tools in scholarly publishing: a thematic analysis,” Sci Ed, vol. 12, nº 1, pp. 28–34, 2025. doi: 10.6087/kcse.352

[8] M. A. Segooa, F. S. Modiba, y I. Motjolopane, “Generative artificial intelligence tools to augment teaching scientific research in postgraduate studies”, South African Journal of Higher Education, vol. 39, nº 1, pp. 294–314, 2025. doi: 10.20853/39-1-6275.

[9] R. Pereira, I. W. Reis, V. Ulbricht, y N. dos Santos, “Generative artificial intelligence and academic writing: an analysis of the perceptions of researchers in training,” Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, vol. 22, nº 4, pp. 429–450, 2024. doi: 10.1108/MRJIAM-01-2024-1501.

[10] J. M. Hansen, O. Ferrell, L. Ferrell, M. A. Levin, P. Wilson, y K. Cloud, “Pandora’s Box Reopened: Can Generative AI Restore Hope or Result in a Decline in the Quest for Academic Integrity,” Journal of Macromarketing, 2025. doi: 10.1177/02761467251363569.

[11] F. Lei, L. Du, W. Wang, M. Dong, y X. Liu, “Effect of generative artificial intelligence on academic publishing ethics: The role of user agreements,” Journal of Information Science, 2025. doi: 10.1177/01655515251359771.

[12] R. Calderon, F. Herrera, y P. Met, “And Plato met ChatGPT: an ethical reflection on the use of chatbots in scientific research writing, with a particular focus on the social sciences,” Humanit Soc Sci Commun, vol. 12, nº 713, 2025. doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04650-0.

[13] S. Watson, E. Brezovec, y J. Romic, “The role of generative AI in academic and scientific authorship: an autopoietic perspective,” AI & Soc, vol. 40, pp. 3225–3235, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-02174-w.

[14] Conroy, R., “Sample size: A rough guide”, 2015. https://goo.su/KVe501

[15] Z. Lin, “Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life,” Roy. Soc. Open Sci., vol. 10, n° 8, 2023. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230658.

[16] Dip. L. Loyola, “Iniciativa que expide la ley para la regulación ética de la inteligencia artificial para los Estados Unidos Mexicanos,” SIL. SEGOB., Ciudad de México, México, abril 2023. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://sil.gobernacion.gob.mx/Archivos/Documentos/2023/04/asun_4543395_20230413_1680209417.pdf

[17] H. Congreso de la Unión, Senado de la República, “iniciativa de ley nacional que regula el uso de la inteligencia artificial,” SIL. SEGOB., Ciudad de México, México, nov. 2024. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://sil.gobernacion.gob.mx/Archivos/Documentos/2024/11/asun_4796143_20241104_1730224428.pdf

[18] V. Velázquez Viveros, “Inteligencia Artificial: oportunidades y desafíos regulatorios en México” Cámara de Diputados: Periodismo Legislativo, 21 de abril 2025. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://comunicacionsocial.diputados.gob.mx/revista/index.php/pluralidad/inteligencia-artificial-oportunidades-y-desafios-regulatorios-en-mexico

[19] Times Higher Education (THE). (2025). World University Rankings 2026. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/latest/world-ranking

[20] JUS. Revista Jurídica. Cuerpo Académico de Derecho Constitucional. Facultad de Derecho Culiacán. (2025). Envíos. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://revistas.uas.edu.mx/index.php/JUS/about/submissions

[21] GénEroos. (2025). Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa (IAG). [En línea]. Disponible en: https://revistasacademicas.ucol.mx/index.php/generos/IA

[22] Atmósfera. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Use. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://www.revistascca.unam.mx/atm/index.php/atm/ArtificialIntelligence

[23] Argumentos. Estudios críticos de la sociedad. (2025). Política de similitud y uso de IA. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://argumentos.xoc.uam.mx/index.php/argumentos/plagio

[24] Diseminaciones. (2025). Política editorial. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://revistas.uaq.mx/index.php/diseminaciones/politica-editorial

[25] Journal of Behavior and Feeding. (2025). Texto e imágenes por IA. Disponible en: https://jbf.cusur.udg.mx/index.php/JBF/textos_imagenes_IA

[26] InnOvaciOnes de NegOciOs. (2025). Sobre la revista. Disponible en: https://revistainnovaciones.uanl.mx/index.php/revin

[27] Investigación Administrativa. (2025). Código de ética. Disponible en: https://www.iadministrativa.escasto.ipn.mx/index.php/IA/ETICA

[28] Acta Universitaria. (2025). Política de uso de inteligencia artificial. Disponible en: https://www.actauniversitaria.ugto.mx/index.php/acta/IA

[29] Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2023). Authorship and AI tools. [En línea]. Disponible en: https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools

[30] Bobier, C., Rodger, D., & Hurst, D. “Artificial intelligence policies in bioethics and health humanities: a comparative analysis of publishers and journals”, BMC Medical Ethics, 26, 79, 2025. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01239-9