Dynamic modules of Pinus pseudostrobus and wood panels

Main Article Content

Javier Ramón Sotomayor-Castellanos

Abstract

This study compares the physical and dynamic properties of solid Pinus pseudostrobus wood and four types of engineered wood panels: edge-glued, plywood, medium-density fiberboard (MDF), and oriented strand board (OSB). Five groups of specimens were prepared to determine moisture content, density, and dynamic moduli in longitudinal and transverse directions using ultrasound. Moisture contents were relatively homogeneous, with lower variation in industrial panels. In terms of density, MDF and OSB exceeded solid wood, while edge-glued panels showed lower density and greater dispersion. Regarding dynamic moduli, solid wood exhibited the highest longitudinal value, while plywood stood out for its transverse stiffness. Dynamic anisotropy was highest in solid wood, in contrast to the derived panels, with MDF showing an almost isotropic behavior. It is concluded that while solid wood retains advantages in unidirectional applications, plywood, OSB, and MDF offer a combination of dimensional stability, homogeneity, and mechanical competitiveness suitable for bidirectional structural systems and precision furniture. Future lines of research are proposed to optimize anisotropy and the sustainability of these materials.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sotomayor-Castellanos, J. R. (2026). Dynamic modules of Pinus pseudostrobus and wood panels. Tecnología En Marcha Journal, 39(2), Pág. 101–110. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v39i2.8072
Section
Artículo científico

References

[1] A. N. Papadopoulos, “Advances in Wood Composites II”, 1st ed. Basel: MDPI, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-03943-522-7

[2] A. Rendón, F. Dorantes, S. Mejía, and L. Alamilla, “Características macroscópicas, propiedades y usos de la madera de especies nativas y exóticas en México”, 1a ed. México: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://bioteca.biodiversidad.gob.mx/janium/Documentos/15522.pdf

[3] J. R. Sotomayor Castellanos and I. Macedo Alquicira, “Caracterización por ultrasonido del multimaterial madera-malla-adhesivo,” Prisma Tecnológico, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://revistas.utp.ac.pa/index.php/prisma/article/view/3972

[4] P. Niemz, W. Sonderegger, T. Keplinger, J. Jiang, and J. Lu, “Physical Properties of Wood and Wood-Based Materials,” in *Handbook of Wood Science and Technology*, P. Niemz, A. Teischinger, and D. Sandberg, Eds. Cham: Springer, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81315-4_6

[5] Z. Cai, C. A. Senalik, and R. J. Ross, “Mechanical properties of wood-based composite materials,” in Wood handbook. Wood as an engineering material, Madison: Forest Products Laboratory, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr282/chapter_12_fpl_gtr282.pdf

[6] J. R. Sotomayor Castellanos and I. Macedo Alquicira, “Determinación de las propiedades de higroexpansión de tableros compuestos a base de madera,” Rev. Cienc. Tecnol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2024. https://doi.org/10.37636/recit.v7n3e348

[7] Physical and mechanical properties of wood. Test methods for small clear wood specimens. Part 1: Determination of moisture content for physical, ISO 13061-1:2014, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/60063.html

[8] Physical and mechanical properties of wood. Test methods for small clear wood specimens. Part 2: Determination of density for physical and mechanical tests, ISO 13061-2:2014, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/60064.html

[9] J. R. Sotomayor Castellanos and E. Mendoza González, “Módulo dinámico e índice material de tableros de densidad media comparados con madera sólida de Pinus spp. Evaluación con pruebas no destructivas,” Temas Cienc. Tecnol., vol. 26, no. 76, pp. 39–45, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://repositorio.utm.mx:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/446/1/2022-TCyT-JRSC.pdf

[10] U. Dackermann, R. Li, J. Elsener, and K. Crews, “A comparative study of using static and ultrasonic material testing methods to determine the anisotropic material properties of wood,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 102, pp. 963–976, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.195

[11] J. Zhou, Y. H. Chui, M. Gong, et al., “Comparative study on measurement of elastic constants of wood-based panels using modal testing: choice of boundary conditions and calculation methods,” J. Wood Sci., vol. 63, pp. 523–538, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-017-1645-0

[12] S. Saad, A. D. Yunianti, and S. Suhasman, “Effect of Layer Structure on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Binderless Composite Plywood,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 593, p. 012012, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/593/1/012012

[13] Y. Kojima, A. Sakakibara, H. Kobori, et al., “Evaluating the durability performance of wood-based panels by a non-destructive bending test,” J. Wood Sci., vol. 62, pp. 263–269, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-016-1545-8

[14] J. C. Gonçalez, N. Santos, F. Gomes da Silva Junior, R. Santos Souza, and M. H. de Paula, “Growth ring width of Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis and its relationship with wood properties,” Sci. For., vol. 46, no. 118, pp. 309–317, 2018. https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v46n120.15

[15] C. Guan, J. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Wang, and L. Zhou, “Evaluation of modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture of full-size wood composite panels supported on two nodal-lines using a vibration technique,” Constr. Build. Mater., pp. 64–72, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.086

[16] T. Ozyhar, S. Hering, S. J. Sanabria, and P. Niemz, “Determining moisture-dependent elastic characteristics of beech wood by means of ultrasonic waves,” Wood Sci. Technol., vol. 47, pp. 329–341, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-012-0499-2

[17] R. de la Cruz-Carrera, A. Carrillo-Parra, J. Á. Prieto-Ruíz, F. J. Fuentes-Talavera, F. Ruiz-Aquino, and J. R. Goche-Télles, “Modulus of Elasticity in Plywood Boards: Comparison between a Destructive and a Nondestructive Method,” Forests, vol. 15, p. 1596, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091596