Sweet pepper production under greenhouse conditions correlation among plant density and yield variables
Main Article Content
Abstract
For sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) cv. FBM-9 grown under greenhouse conditions and using two pruning systems (Spanish and Dutch), the researchers estimated Pearson correlations among plant density and the following variables: number of fruits per plant and per square meter, fruit weight (g), and total and commercial yield (ton/ha). The crop was planted on coconut fiber as substrate, and managed with fertigation. There were 10 statistically significant Pearson correlations (p≤0,05). In those cases the linear regression statistics were calculated. Independently of pruning system, there was significant correlation between plant density and: number of noncommercial fruits per plant (r = -0,55**); number of first quality fruits per square meter (r = 0,58**); total yield (r = 0,42*); first quality yield (r = 0,65**); and commercial yield (r = 0,43*). Furthermore, only for Spanish pruning treatments there was significant correlation between plant density and: number of second quality fruits per plant (r = -0,59*); fruit weight (r = 0,76**); and first quality fruit weight (r = 0,62*). It is concluded that the use of a higher plant density is the best option for growers, from an economical point of view. It is recommended to evaluate higher plant densities than those used in this trial (2,60-3,90 plants/m2), to determine the optimum plant density.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación y pueda editarlo, reproducirlo, distribuirlo, exhibirlo y comunicarlo en el país y en el extranjero mediante medios impresos y electrónicos. Asimismo, asumen el compromiso sobre cualquier litigio o reclamación relacionada con derechos de propiedad intelectual, exonerando de responsabilidad a la Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica. Además, se establece que los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
References
[2] E. Jovicich, D. J. Cantliffe y G. J. Hochmuth, «Plant density and shoot pruning on yield and quality of a summer greenhouse sweet pepper crop in Northcentral Florida,» de Proceedings 28th National Agricultural Plastics Congress, 19-22 May, Tallahassee, Florida, EE.UU., 1999.
[3] D. Maniutiu, R. Sima, A. S. Apahidean, M. Apahidean y D. Ficior, «The influence of plant density and shoot pruning on yield of bell pepper cultivated in plastic tunnel,» Bulletin UASVM Horticulture, vol. 67, nº 1, pp. 259-263, 2010.
[4] E. Jovicich, D. J. Cantliffe y P. J. Stoffella, «Fruit yield and quality of greenhouse-grown bell pepper as influenced by density, container, and trellis system,» Hort Technology, vol. 14, nº 4, pp. 507-513, 2004.
[5] M. H. Aminifard, H. Aroiee, A. Ameri y H. Fatemi, «Effect of plant density and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and fruit quality of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.),» African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 7, nº 6, pp. 859-866, 2012.
[6] S. Cancaya, A. Balkaya y O. Karaagac, «Canonical correlation analysis for the determination of relationships between plant characters and yield components in red pepper [Capsicum annuum L. var. conoides (Mill.) Irish] genotypes,» Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 8, nº 1, pp. 67-73, 2010.
[7] E. Madosa, S. Ciulca, G. Velicevici, C. Avadanei, L. Sasu, A. Cioroga y I. Friskan, «Study of correlations between component characters of production capacity of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum),» Bulletin UASVM, Horticulture, vol. 65, nº 1, pp. 90-94, 2008.
[8] V. K. Sharma, C. S. Semwal y S. P. Uniyal, «Genetic variability and character association analysis in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.),» Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, vol. 2, nº 3, pp. 58-65, 2010.
[9] L. Sasu, E. Madosa, G. Velicevici, S. Ciulca, C. Avadanei y G. Gorinoiu, «Studies regarding correlations between the main morphological traits in a collection of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum var. grossum) local landraces,» Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology, vol. 17, nº 2, pp. 285-289, 2013.
[10] A. Ben-Chaim y I. Paran, «Genetic analysis of quantitative traits in pepper (Capsicum annuum),» Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, vol. 125, nº 1, pp. 66-70, 2000.
[11] J. D. Gamayo, «El cultivo protegido de pimiento,» de Pimientos, España, Ediciones de Horticultura, 1996, pp. 33-40.
[12] M. H. Aminifard, H. Aroiee, S. Karimpour y H. Nemati, «Growth and yield characteristics of paprika pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in response to plant density,» Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 9, nº 5, pp. 276-280, 2010.
[13] S. Cebula, «Optimization of plant and shoot spacing in greenhouse production of sweet pepper,» Acta Horticulturae, vol. 412, pp. 321-329, 1995.
[14] P. Lorenzo y N. Castilla, «Bell pepper yield response to plant density and radiation in unheated plastic greenhouse,» Acta Horticulturae, vol. 412, pp. 330-334, 1995.
[15] H. Y. Dasgan y K. Abak, «Effects of plant density and number of shoots on yield and fruit characteristics of peppers grown in glasshouses,» Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry, vol. 27, pp. 29-35, 2003.
[16] R. Rotondo, M. C. Mondino, J. A. Ferratto, R. Grasso y A. Longo, «Efecto de la poda de conducción, raleo de frutos y densidad de plantación sobre la productividad del cultivo de pimiento (Capsicum annuum L.), bajo invernadero,» Horticultura Argentina, vol. 22, nº 53, pp. 5-9, 2003.
[17] L. Zúñiga-Estrada, J. d. J. Martínez-Hernández, G. A. Baca-Castillo, A. Martínez-Garza, J. L. Tirado-Torres y J. Kohashi-Shibata, «Producción de chile pimiento en dos sistemas de riego bajo condiciones hidropónicas,» Agrociencia, vol. 38, nº 2, pp. 207-218, 2004.
[18] M. M. Maboko, C. P. Du Plooy y S. Chiloane, «Effect of plant population, stem and flower pruning on hydroponically grown sweet pepper in a shadenet structure,» African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 7, nº 11, pp. 1742-1748, 2012.
[19] S. Seifi, S. H. Nemati, M. Shoor y B. Abedi, «The effect of plant density and shoot pruning on growth and yield of two greenhouse bell pepper cultivars,» Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture, vol. 3, nº 11, pp. 77-83, 2012.
[20] F. E. Vicente-Conesa y M. J. Sáez-García, «Comparación de poda a dos guías, a tres guías, aclareo de tallos y cultivo libre en cultivo integrado de pimiento en invernadero,» de 31 Seminario de Técnicos y Especialistas en Horticultura, Almagro, Ciudad Real, 2001, Almagro, Ciudad Real, España, 2004.
[21] R. L. Grijalva-Contreras, R. Macías-Duarte y F. Robles-Contreras, «Productividad y calidad de variedades y densidades de chile bell pepper bajo condiciones de invernadero en el Noroeste de Sonora,» Biotecnia, vol. 10, nº 3, pp. 3-10, 2008.
[22] R. C. Reséndiz-Melgar, E. C. Moreno-Pérez, F. Sánchez-Del Castillo, J. E. Rodríguez-Pérez y A. Peña-Lomelí, «Variedades de pimiento morrón manejadas con despunte temprano en dos densidades de población,» Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura, vol. 16, nº 3, pp. 223-229, 2010.
[23] N. Cruz-Huerta, F. Sánchez, J. Ortiz y M. C. Mendoza, «Altas densidades con despunte temprano en rendimiento y período de cosecha en chile pimiento,» Agricultura Técnica en México, vol. 35, nº 1, pp. 70-77, 2009.