Information, knowledge and communications management model for project management
Main Article Content
Abstract
Intellectual capital emerges in this era as a determining factor for successful business performance, promoting the development of strategies for comprehensive knowledge and information management. Simultaneously, projects continue to be a cornerstone for achieving business goals. However, adapting to new market conditions, particularly influenced by technological forces, necessitates mechanisms, models, or methods that integrate aspects that have been analyzed separately until now. In this context, through a literature review approach, a state of the art is reached, determining that although various bodies of knowledge, frameworks, and models mention information, knowledge, and communication, they do not address these aspects comprehensively. Based on the above and as a result of a graduation project for the Master’s in Project Management at TEC, this research proposes a knowledge and information management model for project management, involving a field study with professionals in the area and reference frameworks to propose its use. The research method applied was a mixed approach, establishing the following study categories: business information and knowledge, information and knowledge management, project management frameworks, and portfolio models. A statistical sample was established for a population characterized by professionals in the field of project management who had graduated from a postgraduate program, with information accessed from TEC, UCI, ULACIT, and ULATINA. The sample size was 331 people with a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence level. This sample was surveyed using an instrument with 10 questions, and a population group comprising representatives from organizations like PMI in Costa Rica was also interviewed. A third technique applied was a systematic literature review for both predictive and agile reference frameworks. The main result obtained is that although the studied frameworks refer to each element—information, knowledge, and communication—there is no explicitly integrated model. Therefore, considering the field results, a generic model for managing these elements is generated and is applicable throughout the project management process. Finally, the research concludes the importance of having a model that integrates these elements, considering their alignment with a business need, which is the capitalization of knowledge and the protection of information, a vital element in the articulation of strategy, such as projects.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación y pueda editarlo, reproducirlo, distribuirlo, exhibirlo y comunicarlo en el país y en el extranjero mediante medios impresos y electrónicos. Asimismo, asumen el compromiso sobre cualquier litigio o reclamación relacionada con derechos de propiedad intelectual, exonerando de responsabilidad a la Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica. Además, se establece que los autores pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
References
[1] Gómez, D., Pérez, M., Curbelo, I. “Gestión del Conocimiento y su Importancia en las Organizaciones. Ingeniería Industrial”. (26.2) 37-46. Instituto Superior Politécnico José Antonio Echeverría La Habana. 2005.
[2] KPMG. “Knowledge Management Research Report 2000”. KPMG Consulting, London. (2000). [En línea]. Disponible: http://www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/kpmg_km_research_report_2000.pdf
[3] McKeen, J., Zack, M., Singh, S. “Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory survey”. Presentado en 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06) (Vol. 7, pp. 152b-152b). (2006). IEEE.
[4] Namdarian, L., Sajedinejad, A., Bahanesteh, S. “The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance: a structural equation modeling study”. AD-minister, (37), 85-108. (2020).
[5] Mahdavi Mazdeh, M., Hesamamiri, R. “Knowledge management reliability and its impact on organizational performance: An empirical study”. Program, 48(2), 102-126. (2014).
[6] Kumbali, H. Ç., İrmiş, A. “The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Organizational Resilience in terms of Organizational Structure”. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 38(2). 448-467. (2022). Doi: 10.24988/ije.1173069
[7] APQC (American Productivity & Quality Center). “2024 Knowledge Management Priorities and Predictions Survey Report”. (2024) [En línea]. Disponible: https://www.apqc.org/resource-library/resource-listing/2024-knowledge-management-priorities-and-predictions-survey
[8] Reich, B., Wee, S. “Searching for knowledge management practices in the PMBOK® guide”. Presentado en PMI Research Conference: Innovations, London, England. Newtown Square, PA. Project Management Institute. (2004). [En línea]. Disponible: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/searching-knowledge-management-concepts-guide-8294
[9] Hanisch, B., Lindner, F., Müller, A., Wald, A. “Project knowledge management: status quo, organizational design, and success factors”. Presentado en PMI Research Conference: Defining the Future of Project Management, Warsaw, Poland. Project Management Institute. (2008). [En línea]. Disponible: https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-knowledge-management-life-cycle-7137
[10] Mills, A., & Smith, T. “Knowledge management and organizational performance: a decomposed view”. Journal of knowledge management, 15(1), 156-171. (2011).
[11] Pereira, L., Fernandes, A., Sempiterno, M., Dias, A., Lopes da Costa, R., António, N. “Management Maturity Contributes to Project-Bases in an Open Innovation Era”. J Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. (2021).
[12] Davidson, P., & Rowe, J. “Systematising knowledge management in projects”. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2(4), 561-576. (2009).
[13] Guerrero, M. “La gestión del conocimiento en las empresas, su importancia y dependencia del estilo del liderazgo de la alta gerencia”. INNOVA Research Journal, 1(1), 1-7. (2016). [En línea]. Disponible: https://revistas.uide.edu.ec/index.php/innova/index
[14] Conley, C., Zheng, W. “Factors critical to knowledge management success. Management Success”. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(3), 334–348. (2009). [En línea]. Disponible: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1523422309338159
[15] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D., & Prisma Group. “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement”. International journal of surgery, 8(5), 336-341. (2010).
[16] Rojas, Y. “Organización de la información: un factor determinante en la gestión empresarial”. ACIMED, 12(2), 1. (2004).
[17] IPMA “Project Excellence Baseline for Achieving Excellence in Projects and Programmes.” (2016).
[18] Kanbam Guide. “Kanban Guides.org (2020). [En línea]. Disponible: https://kanbanguides.org/english/
[19] PMI. “A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge” (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute. (2017).
[20] Palacio, M. “Scrum Master”. Temario Troncal 1. Versión 3.0. Srum Manager. (2022).