Breaking Barriers: Unleashing the Power of Feminist Action Research to Transform Organisational Inequalities—A Case Study of XEAS País Valencià
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
There are multiple approaches to examining 'gender in organisations,' each exhibiting diversity and originating from various fields and ideological frameworks. Mainstream literature on 'gender in organisations' focuses on gender-based differences within the organisation—emphasizing concepts like glass ceilings, sticky floors, and variations in management practices between men and women—to shed light on discriminatory practices against women. However, this perspective, which views organisations as gender-neutral spaces, overlooks concealed mechanisms that perpetuate patriarchal social structures. These mechanisms not only act as obstacles to equal job opportunities but also create environments marked by inequality, discrimination, and violence, mirroring societal-level issues. To address these shortcomings, the article adopts an approach from Feminist Action Research methods, highlighting its ability to challenge power dynamics and facilitate inclusive decision making processes, revealing its influence on transformation at organisational, personal, and social levels. To illustrate the benefits from Feminist Action Research, this article explains the research process conducted at Alternative and Solidarity Economy Network of the Valencian Country (XEAS País Valencià, using its Valencian acronym) over 14 months. During this period a feminist organisational change process was implemented to reflect upon and transition towards a more liveable organisation. Various qualitative techniques, such as semi-structured interviews, participatory workshops, participant observation, and document review, were combined to conduct this study. The lessons learned from this study can inspire future similar studies in the Management field, with an aspiration to address gender
discrimination issues more in-depth.
Article Details
The digital version of the journal is registered under the BY-NC-ND 4.0 Creative Commons license. Therefore, this work may be copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
The authors keep the copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication and the possibility of editing, reproducing, distributing, exhibiting and communicating in the country and abroad through printed and electronic means. On the other hand, the author declares to assume the commitment on any litigation or claim related to the rights of intellectual property, exonerating of responsibility to the Business School of the Costa Rica Institute of Technology.
References
Acker, J. (1988). Class, gender, and the relations of distribution. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 13(3), 473-497. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3174169
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organisations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158. https://www.jstor.org/stable/189609
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organisations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
Acker, J. (2011). Theorizing gender, race and class in organisations. Handbook of Gender, Work and Organisation, 5(8), 65-80. https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=bPj3SlxqyFMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA65&dq=joan+acker+2011&ots=edLdB67HhS&sig=Bb1ABJ4DUPQKSos5_Yls9apPV-M#v=onepage&q&f=false
Arias-Cascante, N., & León-Jiménez, S. (2013). Brechas de género en las mujeres (Gender breeches in working women classes). Tec Empresarial, 7(3), 7-22. https://hdl.handle.net/2238/5521
Askunze-Elizaga, C. (2023). Construir organizaciones habitables desde la ecología. Aprender de la naturaleza para transformar las organisaciones. REAS Euskadi, Alboan. https://reaseuskadi.eus/wp-content/uploads/GUIA-SOSTENIBILIDAD-ECOLOGICA-CAS.pdf
Boni, A., & Frediani, A. (2020). Expanding capabilities through participatory action research. In Enrica Chiappero, Siddiqur Osman, i Mozaffar Qizilbash (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Capability Approach, (pp. 477-496). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316335741
Bluhm, D. J., Harman, W., L., Thomas W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Qualitative research in management: A decade of progress. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1866-1891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00972.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research. A practical guide for beginners. Sage. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256089360_Successful_Qualitative_Research_A_Practical_Guide_for_Beginners
Cáceres, P. (2019). El género en el cambio organizacional: instituciones, poder y agencia, Pelícano, 5, 8-34.
Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (2016). Feminist Theories of Organisation. In Nancy Naples, Renee Hoogland, Maithree Wickramasinghe i Wai Chi Angela Wong (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies, (pp. 1-6). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss421
Calás, M. B.; Smircich, L., & Holvino, E. (2014). Theorizing gender and organisation: Changing times... changing theories. In Savita Kumra, Ruth Simpson i Ronald J. Burke (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Gender in Organisations (pp. 17-52). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199658213.013.025
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046768800800490
Contreras-Pacheco, O. E., Álvarez-Arciniegas, J. C., & Garnica-Rugeles, M. F. (2024). Crisis communication strategies: A qualitative study about a natural medicine controversy in Colombia. Tec Empresarial, 18(2), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.18845/te.v18i2.7136
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
Decreto 40/2018, de 27 de marzo, por el que se regulan las ayudas a entidades de cooperación para promover procesos de cambio organizacional pro-equidad de género. Boletín Oficial del País Vasco. Victoria-Gasteiz, 67, de 9 de abril de 2018, 1-16.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research/book242504#preview
Erro-Garcés, A., & Alfaro-Tanco, J. A. (2020). Action research as a meta-methodology in the management field. International Journal Of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920917489
Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogía de la autonomía: saberes necesarios para la práctica educativa. Siglo XXI. https://beu.extension.unicen.edu.ar/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/218/paulo%20freire%20-%20pedagogia%20de%20la%20autonomia.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Garcia, D., & Gluesing, J. C. (2013). Qualitative research methods in international organisational change research. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 26(2), 423-444. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811311328416
Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2008). Power and knowledge. In Peter Reason i Hilary Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Action Research. (pp. 71-81). Sage.
Gender at Work (2024). Analytical framework. https://genderatwork.org/analytical-framework
Greenwood, D.J. & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: social research for social change (2ª ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984614
Ibáñez, J.(1994). El regreso del sujeto: la investigación social de segundo orden. Siglo XXI.
Jara, Ó. (2017). La concepción metodológica dialéctica, los métodos y las técnicas participativas en la educación popular. Publicaciones Alforja.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R., (2005). Participatory action research communicative action and the public sphere. In Norman Denzin i Yvonna Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 559-603). Sage. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232521456_Participatory_Action_Research_Communicative_Action_and_the_Public_Sphere
Lewin, K. (1946). Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
Luxán, M., & Azpiazu, J. (2016). Metodologías de investigación feminista. Módulo III: Metodología para la implementación de la igualdad. [Materiales del módulo]. UPV/EHU. https://www.ehu.eus/documents/1734204/6145705/Metodolog%C3%ADas+de+Investigaci%C3%B3n+Feminista.pdf/54172098-3058-1d47-df68-780965fa8f46?t=1513345070000
Martí, J. (2017). La investigación-acción participativa: estructura y fases. Experto en nuevas metodologías de las ciencias sociales. [Materiales docentes]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://beu.extension.unicen.edu.ar/xmlui/handle/123456789/175
Mugarik Gabe (2019). Antes del viaje. Viajando por lo invisible. https://www.mugarikgabe.org/viajandoporloinvisible/antes-del-viaje/
Navarro, N. (2007). Desigualdades de género en las organizaciones. Procesos de cambio organizacional pro equidad. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). https://americalatinagenera.org/gender-mainstreaming-o-transversalidad/desigualdades-de-genero-en-las-organizaciones-procesos-de-cambio-organizacional-pro-equidad/
Navarro, N. (2011, june). Cambio organizacional pro equidad de género [Conference presentation]. Tercer Seminario Internacional Sobre Cultura Organizacional, Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres de los Estados Unidos de México. https://www.studocu.com/es-ar/document/universidad-de-buenos-aires/planeamiento-estrategico/cambio-organizacional-pro-equidad-fi/34691039
Navarro, N. (2017). En las organizaciones también queremos bailar. Cambio organizacional pro equidad de género. Mugarik Gabe. https://viajandoporloinvisible.mugarikgabe.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Natalia-Navarro-Queremos-bailar.pdf
Park, P. (2006). Knowledge and participatory research. Handbook of action research: Concise paperback edition, 83-93. https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=JIUZWpgvXvUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA83&dq=park+2006+research+action&ots=_-aXJCUF8x&sig=SbFEcyWX6RmP9nGtP0Fk6SRXp4I&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=park%202006%20research%20action&f=false
Pajares, L. (2019). Análisis de las resistencias al género en las ONG de desarrollo. Visibilizando las incoherencias para la transformación. Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15704.03844
Pérez, Z. (2020). Equidad de género. Pistas para las organizaciones de la economía solidaria. REAS Euskadi, Alboan. https://reaseuskadi.eus/wp-content/uploads/EQUIDAD-DE-GENERO-DEF.pdf
Piris, S., Sáenz de Ugarte, E., Balboa, T., & Pérez, Z. (2020). Será habitable o no será. Apuntes feministas para nuestras organizaciones (pequeñas). REAS Euskadi. https://www.economiasolidaria.org/recursos/sera-habitable-o-no-sera-apuntes-feministas-para-nuestras-organizaciones-pequenas/
Powell, G. N. (Ed.). (1999). The Handbook of Gender and Work. SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/handbook-of-gender-and-work/book9259
Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1987). Status hierarchies and sex segregation. In C. Bose & G. Spitze (Eds.), Ingredients for women’s employment policy (pp. 1-21). SUNY University Press. https://books.google.co.cr/books?hl=es&lr=&id=MWlK33U4tkUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=Status+hierarchies+and+sex+segregation&ots=-K-Dfm8L9w&sig=gY3_0Wbg1rSTRX-QQLCG-gcCz6Y#v=onepage&q=Status%20hierarchies%20and%20sex%20segregation&f=false
REAS Euskadi (2019). Plan pro-equidad de género en REAS Euskadi 2018-2022. REAS Euskadi. https://reaseuskadi.eus/mediateka/bizigarri-plan-pro-equidad-de-genero-en-reas-euskadi-2018-2022/
REAS Euskadi (2024, June 22). Organizaciones habitables. REAS Euskadi https://reaseuskadi.eus/hacemos/organizaciones-habitables/
Rodriguez, T., Montañés, M., & Martí, J. (coords.) (2000). La investigación social participativa. El viejo topo. https://www.redcimas.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/lcc1_investigacion_participativa.pdf
Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 582-603. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2392581
Üsdiken, B. (2014). Centres and peripheries: Research Styles and Publication Patterns in ‘Top’ US journals and their European Alternatives, 1960-2010. Journal of Management Studies, 51(5), 764-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12082
Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminist thought: Implications for organisational studies. https://monoskop.org/images/a/ab/Wajcman_Judy_Feminism_Confronts_Technology_1991.pdf
West, C. & Zimmermann, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432870010020
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Sage.