Risk perception in the Costa Rican construction industry: The role of co-workers’ behavior and regional differences
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Accident prevention in the construction industry depends not only on managing objective hazards but also on how workers perceive risks. In this sense, the influence of peers' behavior and regional context remain less understood. This study investigates how coworkers’ safety practices and territorial differences shape risk perceptions among Costa Rican construction workers. We collected survey data in 2024 from 194 employees across 23 sites in two Costa Rican provinces, Cartago (Central Valley) and Limón (Caribbean coast). A confirmatory factor analysis validated a second-order construct of perceived risk encompassing falls, struck-by hazards, and machinery-related risks, and OLS regressions were estimated to test the influence of social and contextual factors on perceived risk. The results indicate that coworkers’ safety behavior significantly influences individual risk awareness, consistent with social learning theories that highlight peer norms as powerful cues. In addition, regional heterogeneity also emerged as a key factor explaining differences in perceived risk: workers in Limón reported systematically lower risk perceptions than those in Cartago, underscoring the role of local safety cultures and enforcement environments. These findings suggest that effective interventions should combine peer-led initiatives with region-sensitive policies, offering new insights for advancing occupational health and safety practice.
Article Details
The digital version of the journal is registered under the BY-NC-ND 4.0 Creative Commons license. Therefore, this work may be copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
The authors keep the copyright and give the journal the right of the first publication and the possibility of editing, reproducing, distributing, exhibiting and communicating in the country and abroad through printed and electronic means. On the other hand, the author declares to assume the commitment on any litigation or claim related to the rights of intellectual property, exonerating of responsibility to the Business School of the Costa Rica Institute of Technology.
References
Abbas, M., Mneymneh, B. E., & Khoury, H. (2018). Assessing on-site construction personnel hazard perception in a Middle
Eastern developing country: An interactive graphical approach. Safety Science, 103, 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ssci.2017.10.026
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Second edition, Open University Press.
Andersen, L. P., Karlsen, I. L., Kines, P., Joensson, T., & Nielsen, K. J. (2015). Social identity in the construction industry:
Implications for safety perception and behaviour. Construction Management and Economics, 33(8), 640-652. https://doi.
org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1087645
Caponecchia, C., & Sheils, I. (2011). Perceptions of personal vulnerability to workplace hazards in the Australian construction
industry. Journal of Safety Research, 42(4), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2011.06.006
Choi, B., Jebelli, H., & Lee, S. (2019). Feasibility analysis of electrodermal activity (EDA) acquired from wearable sensors to
assess construction workers’ perceived risk. Safety Science, 115, 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.01.022
Gierlach, E., Belsher, B. E., & Beutler, L. E. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in risk perceptions of disasters. Risk Analysis: An
International Journal, 30(10), 1539-1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01451.x
Gómez-Bull, K. G., Ibarra-Mejía, G., & Vargas-Salgado, M. M. (2023). Risk perception in the construction industry: A literature
review and future research directions. Work, 76(4), 1333-1344. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-220379
INEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos). (2023). Estadísticas de la construcción: I semestre 2023 (Vol. 27, No. 1). San
José, Costa Rica: https://www.inec.go.cr/publicaciones/reeconst-is2023.pdf
Lafuente, E., & Abad, J. (2021). Territorial efficiency: Analysis of the role of public work safety controls. Safety Science, 134,
105074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105074
Lafuente, E., & Abad, J. (2018). Analysis of the relationship between the adoption of the OHSAS 18001 and business performance
in different organizational contexts. Safety Science, 103, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.11.002
Lafuente, E., Abad, J., & Vaillant, Y. (2018). Safety disconnect: Analysis of the role of labor experience and safety training on work
safety perceptions. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 11(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2467
Lee, G., Choi, B., Jebelli, H., & Lee, S. (2021). Assessment of construction workers’ perceived risk using physiological data from
wearable sensors: A machine learning approach. Journal of Building Engineering, 42, 102824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jobe.2021.102824
Lee, J. (2022). Good and bad apples in a Barrel: Opposing ends of within-workgroup safety climate. Safety Science, 145, 105502.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105502
Man, S. S., Alabdulkarim, S., Chan, A. H. S., & Zhang, T. (2021a). The acceptance of personal protective equipment among
Hong Kong construction workers: An integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior with risk
perception and safety climate. Journal of Safety Research, 79, 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.09.014
Man, S. S., Chan, A. H. S., Alabdulkarim, S., & Zhang, T. (2021b). The effect of personal and organizational factors on the risktaking
behavior of Hong Kong construction workers. Safety Science, 136, 105155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105155
Martinez-Fiestas, M., Rodríguez-Garzón, I., Delgado-Padial, A., & Lucas-Ruiz, V. (2017). Analysis of perceived risk among
construction workers: a cross-cultural study and reflection on the Hofstede model. International Journal of Occupational
Safety and Ergonomics, 23(3), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1198621
Mastrantonio, R., Cofini, V., Mastrangeli, G., Pettinaro, M., Mastrodomenico, M., & Fabiani, L. (2024). Occupational risk
perception of construction workers: a cross sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1338604. https://doi.org/10.3389/
fpubh.2024.1338604
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations
on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1): 539-569.
Ricci, F., Modenese, A., Bravo, G., De Pasquale, F., Ferrari, D., Bello, M., ... & Gobba, F. (2019). Ethnic background and
risk perception in construction workers: Development and validation of an exploratory tool. International Journal of
Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 33(2), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01478
Rodríguez-Garzón, I., Martínez-Fiestas, M., Delgado-Padial, A., & Lucas-Ruiz, V. (2016). An exploratory analysis of perceived
risk among construction workers in three Spanish-speaking countries. Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management, 142(11), 04016066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001187
Taylor, W. D., & Snyder, L. A. (2017). The influence of risk perception on safety: A laboratory study. Safety Science, 95, 116-124.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.02.011
Xia, N., Xie, Q., Hu, X., Wang, X., & Meng, H. (2020). A dual perspective on risk perception and its effect on safety behavior:
A moderated mediation model of safety motivation, and supervisor’s and coworkers’ safety climate. Accident Analysis &
Prevention, 134, 105350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105350
Zong, Z., Long, T., Ou, Y., & Zhang, S. (2025). Dual-path influence of risk perception on construction workers’ safety participation
and the moderating role of mindfulness. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(1), 04024194. https://
doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15534